[Vascular access guidelines for hemodialysis]. / Guías de acceso vascular en hemodiálisis.

Quality of vascular access (VA) has a remarkable influence in hemodialysis patients outcomes. Dysfunction of VA represents a capital cause of morbi-mortality of these patients as well an increase in economical. Spanish Society of Neprhology, aware of the problem, has decided to carry out a revision of the issue with the aim of providing help in comprehensión and treatment related with VA problems, and achieving an homogenization of practices in three mayor aspects: to increase arteriovenous fistula utilization as first vascular access, to increment vascular access monitoring practice and rationalise central catheters use. We present a consensus document elaborated by a multidisciplinar group composed by nephrologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologysts, infectious diseases specialists and nephrological nurses. Along six chapters that cover patient education, creation of VA, care, monitoring, complications and central catheters, we present the state of the art and propose guidelines for the best practice, according different evidence based degrees, with the intention to provide help at the professionals in order to make aproppiate decissions. Several quality standars are also included.

Antiplatelet therapy alters iron requirements in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are prone to develop iron deficiency because of consumption of iron stores during erythropoietin (EPO) therapy. Data are needed to establish the factors involved in the different iron needs among these patients. Sixty-five HD patients were prospectively studied during a year. The subjects were dialyzed through polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts (n = 23), arteriovenous native fistulae (n = 41), and a Permcath (n = 1). Twenty-four patients were administered aspirin; 23 patients, ticlopidine; 1 patient, dipyridamole; and 4 patients, anticoagulation with acenocoumarol. Iron supplementation (oral or parenteral) and laboratory parameters were recorded monthly. Significant differences in iron requirements, depending on the use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation agents, were found. Total parenteral iron supplements were greater in patients on antiplatelet therapy with either native or graft vascular accesses compared with the rest (2,406 +/- 1,445 versus 1,562 +/- 858 mg; P = 0.0081). Twelve of 52 patients on antiplatelet therapy required oral iron and only 1 of 13 patients not on antiplatelet therapy was administered oral iron supplements (P < 0.05). Patients on antiplatelet therapy were administered more transfusions (1.9 +/- 3.8 transfusions/y) than individuals not on antiplatelet therapy (0.15 +/- 0.3 transfusions/y; P = 0.0015). However, only patients with PTFE grafts on antiplatelet therapy had a post-HD bleeding time longer than patients not on antiplatelet therapy (9.1 +/- 3.6 versus 5.7 +/- 3.9 minutes; P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the use of antiplatelet agents (P < 0.05) is an independent factor that increased the probability of requiring greater parenteral iron supplements (>2.5 g/y). Patients with PTFE grafts required more EPO than those with autologous fistulae (160 +/- 93 versus 100 +/- 63 U/kg/wk; P = 0.012). No differences between groups were found that could explain this finding. Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy implied the use of greater amounts of iron supplements in HD patients. Although these greater requirements of iron occurred in parallel with bleeding from the vascular access, additional data favor the existence of other factors, eg, interdialytic blood losses. The present study suggests that antiplatelet therapy may be an important factor in determining iron requirements in HD patients. Moreover, our data relate for the first time the use of prosthetic grafts with increased EPO requirements, an issue of great potential importance in the debate about vascular access policy in dialysis units.